切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 55 -64. doi: 10.3877/ cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2025.01.009

临床论著

尪痹胶囊联合来氟米特对类风湿关节炎炎症指标的影响
张霞1,(), 冯娅娆1, 罗寰1, 杨金良1, 张斌2, 郑学军1   
  1. 1. 075000 张家口市,河北北方学院附属第一医院风湿免疫科
    2. 075000 张家口市,河北北方学院附属第一医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-30 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 张霞
  • 基金资助:
    河北省中医药管理局科研项目(2024320)

Effects of combination of leflunomide capsule and methotrexate on rheumatoid arthritis inflammatory indices

Xia Zhang1,(), Yarao Feng1, Huan Luo1, Jinliang Yang1, Bin Zhang2, Xuejun Zheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, China
  • Received:2024-04-30 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xia Zhang
引用本文:

张霞, 冯娅娆, 罗寰, 杨金良, 张斌, 郑学军. 尪痹胶囊联合来氟米特对类风湿关节炎炎症指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 55-64.

Xia Zhang, Yarao Feng, Huan Luo, Jinliang Yang, Bin Zhang, Xuejun Zheng. Effects of combination of leflunomide capsule and methotrexate on rheumatoid arthritis inflammatory indices[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 55-64.

目的

评价尪痹胶囊联合来氟米特治疗湿热阻络型类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效及治疗前后血清巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、T细胞亚群等变化。

方法

前瞻性选择河北北方学院附属第一医院风湿免疫科2022年2月至2023年10月90例符合《中国类风湿关节炎诊疗指南》中RA诊断标准且中医辩证为湿热阻络证的患者作为研究对象;排除对甲氨蝶呤药物治疗不耐受者,患有对本研究观察指标有影响的疾病患者,或近期接受过生物制剂或免疫抑制剂治疗,对本研究药物有禁忌症者。采用随机数字表法分为2组,对照组45例采取来氟米特治疗12周,观察组45例在此基础上加用尪痹胶囊。比较两组治疗前、治疗12周后检测血清GM-CSF、TNF-α、T细胞亚群、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、28个关节疾病活动度评分(DAS28)、压痛关节数、肿胀关节数、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP),并评价疗效。非正态分布的计量资料用MP25P75)描述,采用秩和检验;正态分布的计量资料用(±s)描述,采用t检验。

结果

治疗12周后两组VAS评分、DAS28、压痛关节数和肿胀关节数均低于治疗前,GM-CSF、TNF-α、ESR、CRP水平均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(观察组t=7.206、5.402、16.808、8.153、17.283、15.279、22.604、20.716, 对照组t=4.826,3.282、9.117、6.305、5.279、9.462、9.206、8.715,均为P<0.05);且观察组治疗12周后VAS评分、DAS28评分、压痛关节数、肿胀关节数、GM-CSF、TNF-α、ESR、CRP水平及差值均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.782、3.827、4.280、4.106、8.226、9.254、6.118、5.742,差值t=4.193、4.106、5.394、4.908、9.240、10.143、7.506、11.628,均为P<0.05)。治疗12周后两组主症(关节肿胀、伸屈不利、晨僵、发热)积分均低于治疗前,观察组次症(口渴、小便黄、大便干燥)积分均低于治疗前(观察组Z=11.076、9.359、9.517、4.938、5.014、4.017、4.362, 对照组Z=4.271、5.824、4.293、4.156,均为P<0.05)。观察组治疗12周后主症和次症积分及差值均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Z=7.626、3.527、4.942、3.642、7.282、4.722、1.916;差值Z=7.620、3.426、4.728、3.517、7.406、4.826、4.806,均为P<0.05)。治疗12周后观察组CD3+、CD4+、自然杀伤(NK)细胞、CD4+/CD8+比值均高于治疗前,CD8+低于治疗前;且观察组治疗12周后白细胞抗原分化簇(CD)3+、CD4+、NK细胞、CD4+/CD8+比值及差值均高于对照组,CD8+绝对值及差值均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(观察组t=24.806,17.443,16.624,22.550,15.744;组间水平 t=9.557、9.127、7.014、8.146、7.682;组间差值t=10.529,9.280,8.106,9.280,8.206; 均为P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为13.3%,对照组为15.6%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.683,P>0.05)。

结论

尪痹胶囊联合来氟米特可降低湿热阻络型RA患者的免疫炎症反应,减轻关节疼痛和主、次症,提高疗效,且不增加不良反应。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of Wangbi Capsules combined with leflunomide in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the damp-heat obstruction type and the changes in serum granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), T cell subsets, etc.before and after treatment.

Methods

A total of 90 patients in the Rheumatology and Immunology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from February 2022 to October 2023 who met the diagnostic criteria for RA in the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in China and whose traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) dialectical theory was damp-heat blocking collateralcollateral syndrome were selected as the study objects.Patients who were intolerant to methotrexate therapy,recently received biologic agents or immunosuppressant treatment, with contraindications to the drugs of this study and had diseases affecting the observational indicators of this study were excluded.The enrolled patients were divided into two groups by random number table method, 45 cases each.The control group were treated with leflunomide for 12 weeks, and the observation group additionally accepted Zobi capsules based on this treatment.Serum GM-CSF, tTNF-α, T cell subsets, visual analogue sale (VAS), 28 joint disease activity score(DAS28), number of tenderness joints, number of swollen joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and Creactive protein (CRP) were compared between the two groups before treatment and 12 weeks after treatment.The main disease and secondary disease scores were statistically analyzed.The measurement data of nonnormal distribution were described by M (P25, P75) and rank sum test was used.The measurement data of normal distribution are described by (±s) and t test was used.

Results

After 12 weeks of treatment, VAS score,DAS28, number of tender joints and swelling joints in both groups were lower than before treatment; the levels of GM-CSF, TNF-α, ESR and CRP were all lower than the data before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (observation group t=7.206, 5.402, 16.808, 8.153, 17.283, 15.279, 22.604, 20.716;control group t=4.826, 3.282, 9.117, 6.305, 5.279, 9.462, 9.206, 8.715, all P<0.05); After 12 weeks of treatment, VAS score, DAS 28 score, number of painful joints, number of swollen joints, GM-CSF, TNF-α,ESR, CRP levels and score differences in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=3.782, 3.827, 4.280, 4.106, 8.226, 9.254, 6.118, 5.742;score differences t=4.193, 4.106, 5.394, 4.908, 9.240, 10.143, 7.506, 11.628; all P<0.05).After 12 weeks of treatment, the scores of main symptoms (joint swelling, adverse extension and flexion, morning stiffness and fever) in both groups were lower than before treatment; the scores of secondary symptoms (thirst, yellow urine,dry stool) in the observation group were lower than the data before treatment (observation group Z=11.076, 9.359,9.517, 4.938, 5.014, 4.017, 4.362; control group Z=4.271, 5.824, 4.293, 4.156; all P<0.05).After 12 weeks of treatment, the scores and differences of the main symptoms and secondary symptoms of the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (Z=7.626,3.527, 4.942, 3.642, 7.282, 4.722, 1.916; score differences Z=7.620, 3.426, 4.728, 3.517, 7.406, 4.826,4.806; all P<0.05).After 12 weeks of treatment, the ratios of cluster differentiation (CD)3+, CD4+, natural killer(NK) cells and CD4+/CD8+ in observation group were higher than before treatment, and CD8+ was lower than before treatment; after 12 weeks of treatment, the ratios and differences of CD3+, CD4+, NK cells and CD4+/CD8+in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the absolute values and differences of CD8+ were lower than those in the control group (observation group t=24.806,17.443,16.624,22.550,15.744;inter-group level t=9.557, 9.127, 7.014, 8.146, 7.682; difference between groups t=10.529,9.280,8.106,9.280,8.206;all P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was 13.3% in the observation group and 15.6% in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.683, P>0.05).

Conclusion

Wangbi Capsules combined with leflunomide can reduce the immune inflammatory response in patients with damp-heat obstruction type RA, alleviate joint pain and primary and secondary symptoms, improve curative effect, and do not increase adverse reactions.

表1 两组患者基线资料
Table 1 Baseline data of the two groups
表2 两组患者的VAS和DAS 28评分比较 [分,(±s)]
Table 2 Comparison of VAS and DAS 28 scores between the two groups
表3 两组压痛和肿胀关节数比较[个,(±s)]
Table 3 Comparison of joint number of tender and swollen between the two groups
表4 两组治疗前后ESR、CRP水平比较(±s
Table 4 Comparison of ESR and CRP levels before and after treatment between the two groups
续表5
Table 5 Comparison of primary and secondary scores between the two groups before and 12 weeks after treatment
中医证候TCM syndrome 组别Groups 例数Number of cases 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
主症Primary symptom
对照组Control group 45 4. 5(2. 0,6. 0) 3. 0(2. 0,5. 0) a -1. 5(0,1. 0)
关节肿痛Swollen and painfuljoints 观察组Observation group 45 4. 5(2. 0,6. 0) 1. 0(0,2. 0) a -3. 5(2. 0,4. 0)
Z 0. 208 7. 262 7. 620
P >0. 05 <0. 001 <0. 001
组别Groups 例数Number of cases 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 4. 0(2. 0,6. 0) 2. 0(2. 0,2. 5) a -2. 0(2. 0,3. 5)
伸屈不利Poor extension 观察组Observation group 45 4. 0(2. 0,6. 00) 1. 0(0,2. 0) a -3. 00(2. 0,4. 0)
Z 0. 304 3. 527 3. 426
P >0. 05 0. 038 0. 040
组别Groups 例数Number of cases 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 4. 5(2. 0,6. 0) 3. 0(2. 0,4. 5) a -1. 5(0,1. 5)
晨僵Morning rigor 观察组Observation group 45 4. 5(2. 0,6. 0) 1. 5(0,4. 0) a -3. 0(2. 0,2. 0)
Z 0. 360 4. 942 4. 728
P >0. 05 0. 025 0. 027
组别Groups 例数Number of cases 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 4. 0(2. 0,6. 0) 3. 0(2. 0,5. 0) a -1. 0(0,1. 0)
发热fever 观察组Observation group 45 4. 0(2. 0,6. 0) 2. 0(1. 0,4. 0) a -2. 0(1. 0,2. 0)
Z 0. 107 3. 642 3. 517
P >0. 05 0. 038 0. 039
次症Secondary symptom 组别Groups 例数Number of cases 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 0(0,0)
口渴thirstily 观察组Observation group 45 2. 5(1. 0,3. 0) 0. 5(0,1. 0) a -2. 0(1. 0,2. 0)
Z 0. 237 7. 282 7. 406
P >0. 05 <0. 001 <0. 001
组别Groups 例数Number of cases 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 0(0,0)
小便黄Yellow urine 观察组Observation group 45 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 0. 5(0,2. 0) a -1. 5(1. 0,1. 0)
Z 0. 327 4. 722 4. 826
P >0. 05 0. 028 0. 026
组别Groups 例数Number of cases 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 0(0,0)
大便干燥Dry stool 观察组Observation group 45 2. 0(1. 0,3. 0) 0. 5(0,1. 0) a -1. 5(1. 0,2. 0) a
Z 0. 302 1. 916 4. 806
P >0. 05 0. 024 0. 027
表6 两组治疗前后GM-CSF、TNF-α水平比较[ng/L,(±s)]
Table 6 Comparison of GM-CSF and TNF-α levels before and after treatment between the two groups
表7 两组治疗前后免疫功能相关细胞指标(±s
Table 7 Immune function related cell indicators before and after treatment of the two groups
组别Groups 例数Number of cases CD3+(106 个/L) CD4+(106 个/L)
治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 804. 42±80. 27 811. 46±81. 45 7. 04±1. 18 461. 18±38. 96 464. 07±38. 57 2. 89±0. 39
观察组Observation group 45 802. 17±72. 63 892. 33±89. 52* 90. 16±16. 89 459. 25±39. 17 485. 39±44. 05* 26. 14±4. 88
t 0. 106 9. 557 10. 529 0. 265 9. 127 9. 280
P >0. 05 <0. 001 <0. 001 >0. 05 <0. 001 <0. 001
组别Groups 例数Number of cases CD8+(106 个/L) NK细胞(%) NK cells
治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value 治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 316. 55±42. 57 312. 66±41. 59 -3. 89±0. 98 13. 81±2. 80 14. 02±2. 86 0. 21±0. 06
观察组Observation group 45 315. 24±41. 48 274. 72±32. 51* -40. 52±8. 97 13. 46±2. 29 18. 19±2. 92* 4. 73±0. 63
t 0. 419 7. 682 8. 106 0. 328 7. 014 6. 973
P >0. 05 <0. 001 <0. 001 >0. 05 <0. 001 <0. 001
组别Groups 例数Number of cases CD4+/CD8+(106 个/L) - - -
治疗前Before treatment 治疗12周12 weeks after treatment 差值Difference value
对照组Control group 45 1. 46±0. 25 1. 48±0. 26 0. 02±0. 01 - - -
观察组Observation group 45 1. 48±0. 22 1. 77±0. 31* 0. 29±0. 09 - - -
t 0. 097 8. 146 8. 206 - - -
P >0. 05 <0. 001 <0. 001 - - -
表8 两组不良反应比较[例(%)]
Table 8 Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups
[12]
李宗兴.尪痹胶囊联合艾拉莫德治疗类风湿关节炎的临床疗效[J].中国实用医药, 2023, 18( 2 ): 158-161.
[13]
Chen LJ, Zhou YJ, Wen ZH, et al.Efficacy and safety of iguratimod combined with methotrexate vs.methotrexate alone in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Z Rheumatol, 2021, 80( 5 ): 432-446.
[14]
谢文慧, 张卓莉.粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子抑制药治疗类风湿关节炎的研究现状[J].中国临床药理学杂志, 2023, 39( 11 ): 1647-1651.
[15]
Jiang H, Gao H, Wang Q, et al.Molecular mechanisms and clinical application of iguratimod: a review[J/OL].Biomedecine Pharmacother, 2020, 122: 109704.DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109704.
[16]
Nozaki Y.Iguratimod: novel molecular insights and a new csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis, from Japan to the world[ J/OL].Life, 2021, 11( 5 ): 457.DOI: 10.3390/life11050457.
[17]
张曼, 李明庆, 李军苗.当归四逆汤联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效[J/OL].中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ), 2023, 17( 5 ):648-652.
[18]
贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 等.重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J/OL].中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2023, 17( 6 ): 860-864.
[19]
武树朋.血清GM-CSF、TNF-α及IL-17在类风湿关节炎中的表达及相关性[J].中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37( 12 ): 3041-3042.
[1]
Maassen JM, Bergstra SA, Chopra A, et al.Phenotype and treatment of elderly onset compared with younger onset rheumatoid arthritis patients in international daily practice[J].Rheumatology( Oxford ),2021, 60( 10 ): 4801-4810.
[2]
秦桂福, 李惠玲, 叶志勤, 等.尪痹胶囊治疗类风湿关节炎60例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2019, 27( 7 ): 54-56.
[3]
Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al.2021 American college of rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis[J].Arthritis Rheumatol, 2021, 73( 7 ): 1108-1123.
[4]
傅艳芬, 罗仕, 陈锦荣, 等.尪痹胶囊联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎临床研究[J].中国药业, 2019, 28( 5 ): 55-57.
[5]
Singh JA.Treatment guidelines in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2022, 48( 3 ): 679-689.
[6]
Nozaki Y, Inoue A, Kinoshita K, et al.Efficacy of iguratimod vs.salazosulfapyridine as the first-line csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis[J].Mod Rheumatol, 2020, 30( 2 ): 249-258.
[7]
Yoshikawa A, Kotani T, Matsuda S, et al.The addition of iguratimod can reduce methotrexate dose in rheumatoid arthritis with clinical remission[J].Mod Rheumatol, 2022, 32( 1 ): 68-73.
[8]
王颖芳, 陈芳, 王柳青, 等.甲氨蝶呤联合艾拉莫德治疗女性中重度活动类风湿关节炎患者的疗效及对卵巢功能影响的研究[J].中国新药杂志, 2024, 33( 16 ): 1681-1686.
[9]
李树岗, 宋远瑛.皂芥二陈汤联合来氟米特治疗痰瘀痹阻证类风湿关节炎疗效及对血清IL-33、BMP-2、GM-CSF的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志, 2021, 30( 4 ): 403-407.
[10]
屈祥科, 孙建荣, 罗静, 等.尪痹制剂联合西药治疗类风湿关节炎疗效及安全性的系统评价和Meta分析[J].中医杂志, 2022,63( 2 ): 129-136.
[11]
王春芳, 刘娟云.尪痹胶囊联合小剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎临床研究[J].光明中医, 2019, 34( 18 ): 2876-2878.
[1] 覃辉, 钟珊, 白凡, 李陈良, 罗伦. 关节镜术后冲击波干预对膝关节炎患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 729-735.
[2] 李志娟, 包瑛, 黄惠梅, 杨楠, 张敏, 王莹, 骞佩, 牛云鹤. A20单倍剂量不足合并系统性红斑狼疮1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 315-322.
[3] 夏爽, 曹敏, 席翔. 后腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗老年T1b期肾癌对患者血清T淋巴细胞亚群及预后生存的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 406-410.
[4] 陈双, 李莲, 彭余, 杨再林. T淋巴细胞及细胞因子在预测肺炎重症转化中的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 750-753.
[5] 泽仁尼玛, 杨建蓉, 李明琴, 陈颖. 阿莫西林/克拉维酸钾对肺结核患者淋巴细胞亚群CD4水平的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 61-63.
[6] 贾辉钰, 卢弘. 肿瘤坏死因子ɑ抑制剂在白塞病葡萄膜炎中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 42-46.
[7] 汤畅通, 王永楠, 王诗筌. 颅脑外伤后阵发性交感神经兴奋患者的药物治疗效果分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 233-237.
[8] 杨卫东, 周威, 向洪涛. 慢性萎缩性胃炎患者幽门螺杆菌感染与炎性细胞因子及病理特征的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 459-464.
[9] 刘萍, 刘占举, 张萃. 英夫利西单抗治疗克罗恩病的临床疗效及影响因素[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 28-34.
[10] 李仔祥, 王苏贵, 张先云, 卢建文, 嵇宏声, 姜福金. 肿瘤相关性巨噬细胞通过TNF-α/B7H3调节人膀胱癌细胞增殖的研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 64-71.
[11] 韩永清, 饶敏超, 傅峰, 黄开荣. 参芪十一味颗粒联合FOLFOX4方案化疗对晚期结直肠癌患者的近期疗效及其对血清IL-35、IL-37和T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 400-404.
[12] 黄山, 吕松琴, 张娟, 徐丽萍, 李佳能, 李晓非. 云南地区新发艾滋病合并其他病原微生物感染患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布特征初探[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 16-20.
[13] 计超, 向群. 乙酰胆碱受体对急性呼吸窘迫综合征小鼠T细胞亚群和炎症因子的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 50-56.
[14] 孟丽君, 宋芹, 邵莉, 李健. 系统性红斑狼疮合并肺动脉高压患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群水平变化及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 38-43.
[15] 裴小华, 张涛, 金柯, 柏云, 高飞, 朱蓓, 赵卫红. 非人类免疫缺陷病毒患者感染肺孢子菌肺炎的诊断学特征并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 224-228.
阅读次数
全文


摘要